Monday, October 13, 2008

Overview

This has been an interesting class for me so far, having never read Chicano literature. Progressing through the texts we have come across similar themes, but what is most interesting is how the representation of each theme contributes to the greater message about Chicano identity in each text. For example, we talked last class about the differences between …y no se lo tragó la tierra and The Salt of the Earth, and how the former found the root of Chicano exploitation in racism and the latter found it in class. Who Would Have Thought It?, …y no se lo tragó la tierra, and the pieces by Jose Marti posed questions without solutions: is the true home of mixed-raced people in Mexico or the U.S., how can the incessant toiling of campesinos be ended, or can Latin Americans be content in the “soulless” culture of the U.S.? The film, on the other hand, established that while racial tensions exist, class is at the root of exploitation, and that liberation lies in unionization. In the second half of the course we can be sure that different questions about Chicano history/identity/destiny will surface. I am particularly looking forward to the subject of Chicana subjectivity that will come out in Woman Hollering Creek.

2 comments:

Leanna said...

Serena,

I like how you managed to elucidate the main thematic and comparative points we came to in class in one short paragraph. Everyone should read this post!
The point you brought up regarding the basis of inequality experienced by Chicanos, wether it is racial, class-based or cultural is important. To me, this begs the follow up question: if a certain elemental difference is responsible for inequality, is that the key piece which creates the Chicano identity, or simply a trait maligned by others?

Juliana S said...

you know what? you are completely right. i never stopped to think but this is my first experience with chicano literature as well. I really enjoyed the review class where we got to dscuss all the books together, i think that goal is really what we are stiving for in this class: the amalgamation of feelings that result in the issues chicanos face, but from different perspectives. Its interesting to hear these issues from people from different backgrounds and toward the different audiences and to see how they differ in some way